Title of Dissertation: The Motivational Effects of the Classroom Environment in
Facilitating Self-Regulated Learning
Dissertation Summary: This study looked at how classroom environment facilitates
self-regulated learning. Self-regulated learning is defined as one ability to
control their learning process through self-motivation. Students can be
motivated in two ways: extrinsically and intrinsically. Extrinsic
motivation is developed by outside resources; while intrinsic motivation
happens internally. Extrinsic motivation requires little deep cognitive thought
or metacognitive processes. Depending on the classroom environment determines
if the student will be able to build either style of motivation. “The purpose
of this study is to enhance our understanding of how instructor-centered
classroom environments affect students’ motivation to learn, which in turn
facilitates or diminishes the use of self-regulated learning strategies”
(Young, 2005, pg. 26). There were three main research questions that were addressed
in the study:
1. Do intrinsically motivated students employ different learning
strategies then extrinsically motivated students (Young, 2005, pg. 26)?
2. How does a student’s achievement goal orientation, perception of
competence, and sense of autonomy affect the degree he or she tends to be
intrinsically or extrinsically motivated (Young, 2005, pg. 26)?
3. How do social factors created by the classroom environment
interact with motivational cognitions to facilitate self-regulated learning
(Young, 2005, pg. 26)?
Young
also presented several hypothesis:
Self-Regulation of Motivation
Hypothesis 1a:
Extrinsically motivated students will use superficial learning strategies
(Young, 2005, pg. 27).
Hypothesis 1b: Intrinsically
motivated students will use deep cognitive and metacognition strategies (Young,
2005, pg. 27).
Self-Regulation of Cognitions
Hypothesis 2a: High
ego-social orientation will be positively associated with extrinsic motivation
(Young, 2005, pg. 28).
Hypothesis 2b: High task
mastery orientation will be positively associated with intrinsic motivation
(Young, 2005, pg. 28).
Hypothesis 2c: High
perceived autonomy will be positively associated with intrinsic motivation
(Young, 2005, pg. 28).
Hypothesis 2d: High
perceived competence will be positively associated with intrinsic motivation
(Young, 2005, pg. 28).
Social Environment
Hypothesis 3a: The
effects of classroom-environment factors on motivation will be mediated by
achievement goals orientation (Young, 2005, pg. 29).
Hypothesis 3b: The
effects of classroom-environment factors on motivation will be mediated by
perceived autonomy and competence (Young, 2005, pg. 29).
Population/Participants: Data
was collected midway through the spring semester in 2003 and survey was given
to each section of the Principles of Marketing program, which included
Marketing Analysis, Marketing Planning, and Marketing Management (Young, 2005,
pg. 29). This study was conducted in a mid-western 4-year university. “The
sequence of sources is designed to systematically expose students to a variety
of instructional methods and cover the traditional marketing curriculum in an
integrated manner” (Young, 2005, pg. 29). The sample population consisted of
257 participants.
Methodology: There
were several theories that were supported with in this study and they include:
cognitive evaluation theory, achievement theory, and self-regulated learning
strategies (Young, 2005).
Data Source: Students
responded to a 4-page self-report questionnaire with scales for each of the
major variables grouped together with individual items randomly ordered within
the scale (Young, 2005, pg. 29).
Conclusion: The
finding concluded empirical support for the theoretical relationship within and
between cognitive evaluation theory, achievement goal theory, and
self-regulated learning strategies in the context of the classroom (Young,
2005, pg. 36). “Superficial learning strategies were linked to extrinsic
motivation, while intrinsic motivation was determined by deep cognitive and
metacognition strategies” (Young, 2005, pg. 36).
3 Resources and Their Relevance:
1. Ames, C., and J. Archer. 1988. Achievement goals in the classroom:
Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational
Psychology 80 (3): 260-67.
Helped to describe classroom strategies that
promote student achievement and their motivation process.
2. Boekaerts, M. 1997. Self-regulated learning: A new concept
embraced by researcher, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students.
Learning and Instruction 7 (2): 161-86.
Provided background literacy and information of
self-regulation learning theory and its process historically.
3. Harter, S. 1981. A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus
extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational
components. Developmental Psychology 17:300-12.
Used a an comparative between intrinsic and
extrinsic oriented classrooms.
The information provided in this study is beneficial
when attempting to establish a classroom culture around self-regulated learning
where students are responsible for their own learning process and are able to
evaluate their performance, set goals, and reflect independently. To create
this classroom environment it is essential that teachers “use rewards carefully
and sparingly” while also “avoiding threats, deadlines, directives, pressured
evaluations, and imposed goals” because things actions creates and extrinsic
learning environment.
Reference
Young, Mark R. (2005). The motivational effects of the
classroom environment in facilitating self-regulated learning. Journal of Marketing Education. 27(1):
25-40.